The PIAT, short for Projector, Infantry, Anti Tank, is a British man-portable anti-tank weapon of the Second World War, developed in 1942 to give ordinary infantry a way to destroy enemy armor at close range as German tank designs grew increasingly difficult for existing infantry anti-tank weapons to defeat. Rather than firing a rocket like contemporary American and German infantry anti-tank weapons, the PIAT launched its hollow-charge bomb using a powerful spring, which avoided the visible back-blast and smoke signature of a rocket launcher and let a soldier fire it from enclosed spaces such as a building interior. The weapon entered British and Commonwealth service in 1943 and remained in front-line use through the rest of the war, valued for its simplicity and lack of a firing signature even though its heavy recoil and awkward cocking mechanism made it a demanding weapon to operate under combat conditions.
Facts
Weapon Class Introduced Year Classification
Service Status Weapon Class
Weapon Class (category) Connections
Operated By
Source Wikipedia: PIAT
Used In
Source Wikipedia: PIAT
Source Wikipedia: PIAT
In the Other Atlases
Sources
1. Wikipedia: PIAT
WikipediaLead sentence
The Projector, Infantry, Anti Tank (PIAT) Mk I was a British man-portable anti-tank weapon developed during the Second World War.
Lead section, second sentence
The PIAT was designed in 1942 in response to the British Army's need for a more effective infantry anti-tank weapon and entered service in 1943.
service-status
service = 1943-1971
- Used In: First Indochina War, infobox wars field: 'First Indochina War'
- Used In: Korean War, infobox wars field: 'Korean War'
Operated By: Indian Army, Wikipedia article text
The Indian Army was still using PIATs by the 1971 Indo-Pakistan war, they were used at the Battle of Longewala helping to halt the Pakistani armoured division advance.
View the Source Wikidata: PIAT (Anti-Tank Weapon)
Wikidata Q326166, class allow-list match (w-wdresolver-0926)View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.