War and Military Atlas

How Battles Were Fought
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Strategy and Doctrine

Fourth-Generation Warfare

Contemporary

Fourth-generation warfare (4GW) is conflict characterized by a blurring of the distinction between war and politics and between combatants and civilians, fought increasingly by decentralized non-state or hybrid actors rather than by opposing state armies. The term was first used in 1980 by a team of American analysts including William S. Lind. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

Facts
Disputed
Core Claim
War increasingly blurs the line between combatant and civilian and between state and non-state actor, fought by decentralized networks rather than by opposing armies alone. 1
Origin Year
1980 1
Connections

Associated With

Sources
1. Wikipedia: Fourth-Generation Warfare
Wikipedia
  • lead paragraph
    Fourth-generation warfare (4GW) is conflict characterized by a blurring of the distinction between war and politics, and of the distinction between combatants and civilians.
  • history section
    The term was first used in 1980 by a team of United States analysts, including William S. Lind, to describe warfare's return to a decentralized form.
  • Criticism section
    The generational model is an ineffective way to depict changes in warfare. Simple displacement rarely takes place, significant developments typically occur in parallel.
View the Source
Dissenting Readings (1 dissenting reading)
Core Claim

Echevarria argues the generational framework itself is unsound: real developments in war occur in parallel rather than as one generation cleanly displacing the last, so what is labeled fourth-generation warfare is better read as insurgency under a new name than as a genuinely new generation of war; other critics such as Lieutenant General Kenneth F. McKenzie Jr. call the theory an "elegant irrelevance" whose central claims are contentious and open to widely varying interpretations. This challenges this entity's core-claim, which states fourth-generation warfare as a settled analytical category rather than a genuinely contested one.

A dissenting reading, from Antulio J. Echevarria II (Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College), "Fourth-Generation War and Other Myths"Wikipedia: Fourth-Generation Warfare, Wikipedia

Take a Related Quiz

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.