War and Military Atlas

How Battles Were Fought
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Weapons System

S-Mine

Grenades And Explosives

The S-mine was a German bounding anti-personnel mine used from 1935 to 1945, with more than 1.93 million produced. When triggered, a small propellant charge threw the mine roughly a meter into the air before it detonated at about waist height, scattering around 360 steel balls and fragments in every direction, a design meant to maim rather than simply kill. German forces relied on it as a core part of Wehrmacht defensive minefields in occupied territory, North Africa, and Italy, where more than 23,000 were laid in that country defense alone, and Allied troops who called it the Bouncing Betty or the frog mine came to regard it as one of the most feared devices of the war; several other armies later copied its design.

Facts
Weapon Class
Bounding anti-personnel mine 2
Introduced Year
1935 1
Classification
Service Status
Retired 1
Weapon Class
Weapon Class (category)
Grenade / Explosive Device 2
Connections

Used In

Vietnam War, Wars
Source S-mine, Wikipedia
Winter War, Wars
Source S-mine, Wikipedia
World War II, Wars
Source S-mine, Wikipedia
Sources
1. Wikidata: S-Mine
Wikidata Q977508, class allow-list match (w-wdresolver-0926)View the Source
2. S-mine, Wikipedia
  • Infobox
    bounding anti-personnel mine
  • Production history section
    The S-mine entered production in 1935
  • service status
    The S-mine was an anti-personnel mine developed by Germany in the 1930s and used extensively by German forces during World War II
  • Weapon class classified from the entity's own sourced description text.
  • Used In: World War II, Infobox, wars field
    Infobox wars field lists: World War II
  • Used In: Winter War, Infobox, wars field
    Infobox wars field lists: Winter War
  • Used In: Vietnam War, Infobox, wars field
    Infobox wars field lists: Vietnam War
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.