War and Military Atlas

How Battles Were Fought
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Weapons System

UKM-2000

Machine Guns And Automatic Weapons

The UKM-2000 is a 7.62x51mm NATO general-purpose machine gun designed and built by Zaklady Mechaniczne Tarnow in Tarnow, Poland, its name standing for Uniwersalny Karabin Maszynowy, or Universal Machine Gun. It was developed in 2000, the year after Poland joined NATO, to give Polish forces a machine gun compatible with standard NATO ammunition. Its design is based on the Soviet PKM machine gun, which Poland had previously built under license, but it was substantially reworked to fire the 7.62x51mm NATO cartridge from disintegrating metallic links rather than the PKM's closed-link belt. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

Facts
Weapon Class
Machine gun 2
Introduced YearSourced to the subject's own account
2000 3
Classification
Caliber
7.62x51mm NATO 1
Weapon Class
Weapon Class (category)
Machine Gun 2
Connections

Used In

Iraq War, Wars
Source Wikipedia: UKM-2000
Source Wikipedia: UKM-2000
Source Wikipedia: UKM-2000
In the Other Atlases
Sources
1. Wikidata: UKM-2000
Wikidata Q2491922, class allow-list match (w-wdresolver-0926)
2. Wikipedia: UKM-2000
  • Caliber attribute (ukm-2000)
    The UKM-2000 is a 7.62x51mm NATO general-purpose machine gun designed and built by Zaklady Mechaniczne Tarnow in Tarnow, Poland, its name standing for Uniwersalny Karabin Maszynowy, or Universal Machine Gun.
  • Used In: War in Afghanistan (2001-2021), Infobox, wars field
    Infobox wars field lists: War in Afghanistan (2001-2021)
  • Used In: Iraq War, Infobox, wars field
    Infobox wars field lists: Iraq War
  • Used In: Russo-Ukrainian War, Infobox, wars field
    Infobox wars field lists: Russo-Ukrainian War
View the Source
3. UKM-2000 (Wikidata)
WikidataWikidata Q2491922 (P571 inception): 2000
Quote, Wikidata Q2491922 (P571 inception): 2000
Inception (Wikidata property P571): 2000.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.