The Type 89 designation covers two distinct and unrelated Japanese aircraft machine guns used by the Empire of Japan from 1929 onward. The fixed type was a recoil operated gun based on the Vickers Class E design, chambered in 7.7x58mm ammunition and synchronized to fire through a fighter propeller arc, while the flexible type used a gas operated mechanism built from a pair of modified Type 11 light machine guns mounted together as a defensive weapon for bomber crews. Both versions served through the Second Sino-Japanese War and the Second World War, and some examples were later encountered during the Korean War. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Facts
Weapon Class
Weapon Class (category) Weapon Class Connections
Operated By
Source Wikipedia: Type 89 machine gun
Used In
Source Wikipedia: Type 89 machine gun
Source Wikipedia: Type 89 machine gun
Source Wikipedia: Type 89 machine gun
Sources
1. Wikipedia: Type 89 machine gun
Caliber attribute (type-89-machine-gun)
The fixed type was a recoil operated gun based on the Vickers Class E design, chambered in 7.7x58mm ammunition and synchronized to fire through a fighter propeller arc, while the flexible type used a gas operated mechanism built from a pair of modified Type 11 light machine guns mounted together as a defensive weapon for bomber crews.
Introduction
covers two distinct and unrelated Japanese aircraft machine guns used by the Empire of Japan from 1929 onward
- Operated By: Imperial Japanese Army, infobox used_by/operator field: 'Imperial Japanese Army'
Used In: Second Sino-Japanese War, Infobox, wars field
Infobox wars field lists: Second Sino-Japanese War
Used In: World War II, Infobox, wars field
Infobox wars field lists: World War II
Used In: Korean War, Infobox, wars field
Infobox wars field lists: Korean War
View the SourceWikidata: Type 89 machine gun
Wikidata Q1390798, class allow-list match (w-wdresolver-0926)View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.