The QTS-11, officially the Type 11 Integrated Combat System and later also designated QDS-121, is a Chinese dual-barrel weapon combining a 20mm airburst grenade launcher as its primary armament with a 5.8mm QBZ-03 assault rifle as a secondary weapon. Built by Norinco beginning in 2011, it entered service with the People's Liberation Army in 2015, first issued to special operations units. Weighing between 5 and 7 kilograms and about 93 centimeters long, it carries an electronic fire control system with a laser rangefinder that lets the operator program a grenade to detonate at a set distance. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Facts
Classification
Service Status Weapon Class Introduced YearSourced to the subject's own account Weapon Class
Weapon Class (category) Connections
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Sources
1. Wikipedia: QTS-11
Lead section
The Type 11 (Chinese: 11式单兵综合作战系统; pinyin: 11 Shì dānbīng zònghé zuòzhàn xìtǒng; lit. 'Type 11 individual integrated combat system'), designated as QTS-11, is an air burst grenade launcher integrated with the QBZ-03 assault rifle in service with the Chinese military since 2015.
Infobox: cartridge
5.8×42mm DBP-10 bullet (KE) 20×28B DQL-12 grenade (HE)
Infobox: service
2015-present
Lead section
The Type 11 (Chinese: 11式单兵综合作战系统; pinyin: 11 Shì dānbīng zònghé zuòzhàn xìtǒng; lit. 'Type 11 individual integrated combat system'), designated as QTS-11, is an air burst grenade launcher integrated with the QBZ-03 assault rifle in service with the Chinese military since 2015. It later received designation QDS-121.
Operated By: People's Liberation Army, Users section
China
View the Source2. QTS-11 (Wikidata)
WikidataWikidata Q49001765 (P571 inception): 2011Quote, Wikidata Q49001765 (P571 inception): 2011
Inception (Wikidata property P571): 2011.
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.