War and Military Atlas

How Battles Were Fought
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Weapons System

M2 flamethrower

Small Arms And Sidearms

The M2 flamethrower was an American man-portable, backpack flamethrower used in World War II, the Korean War, and the Vietnam War. It was the successor to the M1 and M1A1 flamethrowers, and although its burn time was only around 7 seconds with flames effective to about 20 to 40 meters, it remained a useful weapon. With the arrival of flamethrower tanks, the need for flamethrower carrying infantrymen to expose themselves to enemy fire was greatly reduced. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

Facts
Weapon Class
Man-portable flamethrower 3
Introduced Year
1943 1
Classification
Service Status
Retired 1
Weapon Class
Weapon Class (category)Sourced to the subject's own account
Flamethrower / Incendiary Weapon 2
Connections

Used In

Korean War, Wars
Source Wikipedia: M2 flamethrower
Vietnam War, Wars
Source Wikipedia: M2 flamethrower
World War II, Wars
Source Wikipedia: M2 flamethrower
Sources
1. Wikidata: M2 flamethrower
Wikidata Q1427038, class allow-list match (w-wdresolver-0926)View the Source
2. M2 flamethrower (Wikidata)
Wikidata
  • Weapon class classified from the entity's own sourced description text.
  • Wikidata Q1427038 (P729 service entry): 1943
    Service entry (Wikidata property P729): 1943.
View the Source
3. Wikipedia: M2 flamethrower
  • service status
    The M2 flamethrower was an American man-portable, backpack flamethrower used in World War II, the Korean War, and the Vietnam War
  • Used In: World War II, Infobox, wars field
    Infobox wars field lists: World War II
  • Used In: Korean War, Infobox, wars field
    Infobox wars field lists: Korean War
  • Used In: Vietnam War, Infobox, wars field
    Infobox wars field lists: Vietnam War
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.