War and Military Atlas

How Battles Were Fought
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Weapons System

Jian (Sword)

Ancient

The jian is a Chinese straight, double-edged sword whose earliest well-documented bronze examples date to the Western Zhou and Spring and Autumn periods of Chinese history, well before 500 CE, after which the type continued in iron and steel forms into the imperial era. Unlike the single-edged curved dao saber that became China's more common cutting and slashing battlefield weapon in later centuries, the jian was designed primarily for thrusting and precise cutting, and Chinese martial and literary tradition came to regard it as an elegant, refined weapon associated with scholar-officials, philosophers and ritual as much as with common battlefield use, earning it a lasting reputation as the gentleman of weapons. Archaeological finds of elaborately cast and inlaid bronze jian, including examples attributed to figures such as King Goujian of Yue, show that the sword also carried significant status and craftsmanship value in ancient China well beyond its purely martial function.

Facts
Weapon Class
Double-edged straight sword (jian) 1
Introduced Year
650 BCE 1
Century-level date only (7th century BCE, Spring and Autumn period); no more precise year given by the source.
Weapon Class
Weapon Class (category)
Sword / Polearm / Bladed 1
Sources
1. Wikipedia: Jian
Wikipedia
  • Jian, lead paragraph, opening definition
    The jian is a Chinese term referring to all double-edged straight sword.
  • Jian, History section, opening sentence
    The first Chinese recorded sources that mention the jian date to the 7th century BCE during the Spring and Autumn period
  • Introduced circa -650 per the entity's own sourced description text; no pre-1900 weapon system remains in current active military service.
View the Source
Wikidata: Jian (Sword)
Wikidata Q1284919, class allow-list match (w-wdresolver-0926)View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.