War and Military Atlas

How Battles Were Fought
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Weapons System

Panhard EBR

Armored Vehicles

The Panhard EBR, French for Engin Blinde de Reconnaissance or armored reconnaissance vehicle, is an armoured car designed by Panhard for the French Army and later used across the globe, notably by the French Army during the Algerian War and by the Portuguese Army during the Portuguese Colonial War. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

Facts
Classification
Caliber
75mm 1
Caliber
90mm 1
Weapon Class
Armoured car (wheeled reconnaissance vehicle) 1
Introduced Year
1951 1
Weapon Class
Weapon Class (category)
Tank / Armored Vehicle 1
Connections

Operated By

Source MilitaryFactory.com: Panhard EBR (Engin Blinde de Reconnaissance)

Used In

Source Wikipedia: Panhard EBR
In the Other Atlases

Manufactured By

Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.

Sources
1. Wikipedia: Panhard EBR
  • Lead, first paragraph
    is an armoured car designed by Panhard for the French Army and later used across the globe, notably by the French Army during the Algerian War and by the Portuguese Army during the Portuguese Colonial War.
  • EBR model 1951 section
    The model 1951 is the first mass-produced model of the EBR, with a total of 836 produced between 1951 and 1954.
  • Used In: Algerian War of Independence, Infobox: wars
    Algerian War Portuguese Colonial War Indonesia-Malaysia Confrontation Sand War Western Sahara War
View the Source
Wikidata: Panhard EBR
Wikidata Q586620, class allow-list match (w-wdresolver-0926)View the Source
MilitaryFactory.com: Panhard EBR (Engin Blinde de Reconnaissance)
MilitaryFactory.comOperated By: French Armed Forces, Operators
Quote, Operated By: French Armed Forces, Operators
[ France; Mauritania; Morocco; Portugal; Tunisia ]
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.