War and Military Atlas

How Battles Were Fought
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Weapons System

LAW 80

Armored Vehicles

The LAW 80, formally the L1A1 94mm HEAT Rocket System, is a man-portable, disposable anti-tank weapon built by Hunting Engineering in the United Kingdom and adopted by the British Army in the early 1990s after production from 1986 to 1997. It fires a HEAT warhead from an extendable launch tube fitted with an integral spotting rifle and sight, capable of penetrating 650 to 700 millimeters of armor, but was withdrawn on safety grounds and replaced by the AT4 CS and FGM-148 Javelin. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

Facts
Weapon Class
Man-portable anti-tank weapon 1
Introduced Year
1987 2
Classification
Service Status
In Service 1
Weapon Class
Weapon Class (category)
Tank / Armored Vehicle 1
Connections

Operated By

Source Wikipedia: LAW 80

Used In

Cold War, Wars
Source Wikipedia: LAW 80
In the Other Atlases

Manufactured By

Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.

Source Wikidata: LAW 80
Sources
1. Wikipedia: LAW 80
  • Lead section
    The LAW 80 (Light Anti-armour Weapon 80), officially referred to as the L1A1 94mm HEAT Rocket System in British service, is a man-portable, disposable anti-tank weapon previously used by the British Army and a few other militaries.
  • Infobox: service
    1987-present
  • Operated By: British Army, Wikipedia article text
    The LAW 80 (Light Anti-armour Weapon 80), officially referred to as the L1A1 94mm HEAT Rocket System in British service, is a man-portable, disposable anti-tank weapon previously used by the British Army and a few other militaries.
  • Used In: Cold War, Infobox: wars
    Cold War, War on terror
View the Source
2. Wikidata: LAW 80
Wikidata Q1309371, class allow-list match (w-wdresolver-0926)View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.