The Rifle, .303 Pattern 1914 was a British service rifle of the First World War period, principally manufactured under contract by companies in the United States. It was a bolt-action weapon with an integral five round magazine that served as a sniper rifle and as second line and reserve issue until it was declared obsolete in 1947. The Pattern 1914 Enfield was the successor to the experimental Pattern 1913 Enfield and the predecessor of the US Rifle M1917 Enfield. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Facts
Classification
Service Status Weapon Class Introduced Year Weapon Class
Weapon Class (category) Connections
Operated By
Source MilitaryFactory.com: Enfield Pattern 1914 (Rifle, .303 Pattern 1914)
Source MilitaryFactory.com: Enfield Pattern 1914 (Rifle, .303 Pattern 1914)
Used In
Source Wikipedia: Pattern 1914 Enfield
Source Wikipedia: Pattern 1914 Enfield
Sources
1. Wikipedia: Pattern 1914 Enfield
Infobox: service
1916-1945 (UK)
Infobox: cartridge
.303 British
Used In: Korean War, Wikipedia article text
Some sniper rifles were used during the Korean War.
Used In: World War II, Wikipedia article text
Prior to and during World War II, over 670,000 Pattern 1914 Enfields were used, after undergoing modification ("Weedon Repair Standard", formally the Mk II standard) in the UK, mainly as a rearguard rifle.
View the SourceWikidata: Pattern 1914 Enfield
MilitaryFactory.com: Enfield Pattern 1914 (Rifle, .303 Pattern 1914)
MilitaryFactory.comOperated By: Australian Defence Force, Operators
[ Afghanistan; Australia; Estonia; Lithuania; Latvia; Greenland; India; Ireland; Israel; Luxembourg; Norway; Philippines; Poland; Soviet Union; United Kingdom; United States ]
Operated By: United States Armed Forces, Operators
[ Afghanistan; Australia; Estonia; Lithuania; Latvia; Greenland; India; Ireland; Israel; Luxembourg; Norway; Philippines; Poland; Soviet Union; United Kingdom; United States ]
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.