War and Military Atlas

How Battles Were Fought
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Weapons System

Barrett REC7

Small Arms And Sidearms

The Barrett REC7, whose name stands for reliability-enhanced carbine, is an American selective-fire rifle built by Barrett Firearms as a variant of the M4 carbine using a short-stroke gas piston system. It is offered chambered in either 5.56x45mm NATO or 6.8mm Remington SPC, and is the second AR-pattern rifle Barrett built for the 6.8mm Remington SPC cartridge, after the earlier Barrett M468, which used the same Stoner bolt and carrier piston system. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

Facts
Classification
Caliber
5.56x45mm NATO 1
Caliber
6.8 mm Remington SPC 1
Weapon Class
small arm 1
Introduced YearSourced to the subject's own account
2004 2
Weapon Class
Weapon Class (category)
Small Arm 1
Connections

Operated By

Source MilitaryFactory.com: Barrett REC7 (Reliablity-Enhanced Carbine 2007)
In the Other Atlases

Manufactured By

Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.

Source Wikidata: Barrett REC7
Sources
1. Wikipedia: Barrett REC7
  • Infobox: cartridge
    5.56×45mm NATO and 6.8mm Remington SPC
  • Lead section
    It is an M4 carbine utilizing a short-stroke gas piston system and is available in either 5.56×45mm NATO or 6.8mm Remington SPC. The REC7 is Barrett's second AR-pattern rifle chambered for the 6.8mm Remington SPC cartridge, the first being the Barrett M468 rifle.
View the Source
2. Barrett REC7 (Wikidata)
WikidataWikidata Q965451 (P571 inception): 2004
Quote, Wikidata Q965451 (P571 inception): 2004
Inception (Wikidata property P571): 2004.
View the Source
Wikidata: Barrett REC7
Wikidata Q965451, class allow-list match (w-wdresolver-0926)
MilitaryFactory.com: Barrett REC7 (Reliablity-Enhanced Carbine 2007)
MilitaryFactory.comOperated By: United States Armed Forces, Operators
Quote, Operated By: United States Armed Forces, Operators
[ United States ]
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.