War and Military Atlas

How Battles Were Fought
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Armed Forces and Units

Armed Forces of Bosnia and Herzegovina

Contemporary

The Armed Forces of Bosnia and Herzegovina, abbreviated OSBiH or AFBiH, are the official military force of Bosnia and Herzegovina. They were officially unified in 2005 from two founding armies, the Bosniak and Bosnian Croat Army of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Army of Republika Srpska of the Bosnian Serbs, whose roots go back to the armies of the Bosnian War, including the Croat Defence Council. The force has a land component and an air component, and three regiments are each drawn from one of the country's three ethnic groups, the Bosniaks, Croats and Serbs. The Ministry of Defence, founded in 2004, is in charge of the force. The unification came after international pressure on the governance of the separate armies, and by 2004 the two armies had reduced to about 12,000 regulars and 240,000 reserves without yet integrating.

Facts
Founded Year
2005 1
Status
Active 2
Personnel
18,000 2
Force Type
Force Type (category)
Army 1
Force Type (category)
Air Force 1
In the Other Atlases

Found In

Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject is found.

Source Armed Forces of Bosnia and Herzegovina (Wikipedia)Lead, first sentence
Quote, Lead, first sentence
is the official military force of Bosnia and Herzegovina
Sources
1. Armed Forces of Bosnia and Herzegovina (Wikipedia)
  • Insignia section
    with either the land force badge or air force badge
  • Lead, first paragraph
    were officially unified in 2005
  • Lead, first sentence
    is the official military force of Bosnia and Herzegovina
View the Source
2. Global Firepower: Bosnia and Herzegovina military strength
Global FirepowerManpower table, Active Personnel (currently ranked and reporting active personnel)
Quote, Manpower table, Active Personnel (currently ranked and reporting active personnel)
Active Personnel 18,000 (0.5%)
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.