War and Military Atlas

How Battles Were Fought
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Weapons System

Pedersen rifle

Small Arms And Sidearms

The Pedersen rifle is a United States semi-automatic rifle designed by John Pedersen in the 1920s and tested by the US Army as part of a program to find a replacement for the M1903 Springfield. Chambered for the .276 Pedersen cartridge and operating on a toggle-delayed blowback action, fewer than 150 were built, primarily for trials, under the designation T1E3. The Army ultimately chose the .30 caliber M1 Garand instead, though the Pedersen rifle's testing shaped the competition that led to the Garand's adoption. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

Facts
Classification
Caliber
.276 Pedersen 1
Service Status
Retired 1
Weapon Class
Weapon Class (category)
Small Arm 1
Weapon Class
small arm 1
Connections

Operated By

Source Wikipedia: Pedersen rifle
Sources
1. Wikipedia: Pedersen rifle
  • Lead
    The Pedersen Rifle, officially known in final form as the T1E3 rifle, was a United States semi-automatic rifle designed by John Pedersen that was made in small numbers for testing by the United States Army during the 1920s as part of a program to standardize and adopt a replacement for the M1903 Springfield.
  • Infobox: cartridge
    .276 Pedersen
  • Lead section
    The Pedersen Rifle, officially known in final form as the T1E3 rifle, was a United States semi-automatic rifle designed by John Pedersen that was made in small numbers for testing by the United States Army during the 1920s as part of a program to standardize and adopt a replacement for the M1903 Springfield.
  • Operated By: United States Army, Infobox: used_by
    United States Army (testing and field trials) Imperial Japan (prototype example encountered after Battle of Okinawa)
View the Source
Wikidata: Pedersen rifle
Wikidata Q7159140, class allow-list match (w-wdresolver-0926)
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.