The Nagant wz. 30 was a Polish revolver, developed in 1930 by the state-owned Fabryka Broni works in Radom as a slightly modified copy of the Nagant M1895. Compared with the Russian or Belgian models it was a little lighter and had a shorter barrel. In 1932 the sight was moved and the design was redesignated wz. 32, and between 1929 and 1935 the Radom works produced 7,166 revolvers of the two variants. The Polish Army had inherited captured Nagant revolvers after 1918 but withdrew them once it settled on the 7.92 mm cartridge, so the type became chiefly a police weapon. A poll of officers in 1927 picked the Nagant system as the State Police standard sidearm for its durability and simplicity, and the revolvers also served with the Postal Guards. They stayed in use through the 1930s, were gradually displaced by the Beretta M1934 and Walther PPK, and were carried by mobilised policemen during the German and Soviet invasions of Poland in 1939.
Facts
Classification
Service Status Weapon Class
Weapon Class (category) Introduced Year Connections
Used In
Source Nagant wz. 30 (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source Nagant wz. 30 (Wikipedia)Lead [introduced-year]Quote, Lead [introduced-year]
in 1930 the state-owned Fabryka Broni works in Radom developed a slightly modified variant
Sources
1. Valka.cz: Nagant wz. 30
Valka.czTechnical dataQuote, Technical data
Cartridge: 7,62 Nagant
View the Source 2. Nagant wz. 30 (Wikipedia)
Lead
Rewolwer Nagant wz. 30 and wz. 32 were two Polish derivatives of the Nagant M1895 revolver.
Lead [introduced-year]
in 1930 the state-owned Fabryka Broni works in Radom developed a slightly modified variant
Lead [service-status]
Between 1929 and 1935 the Radom works produced 7,166 revolvers of both variants.
Used In: World War II, Nagant wz. 30, last paragraph
They were also widely used by mobilised policemen during the German and Soviet invasion of Poland of 1939.
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.