The Charioteer, formally the FV4101 Tank Medium Gun Charioteer, is a post-Second World War British armored fighting vehicle built on an upgraded Cromwell cruiser tank chassis to give Royal Armoured Corps units still using Cromwells a more powerful anti-tank gun against Cold War Soviet armor. Manufactured by Robinson and Kershaw Ltd at Dukinfield, Cheshire, about 442 of a planned 630 were built, each mounting an 84mm Ordnance QF 20-pounder gun in a new two man turret on a 28.5 tonne hull with a top speed of 32 miles per hour. In British Territorial Army and export service from 1952 to 1980, it saw combat with Middle Eastern forces in the Lebanese Civil War and the 1978 South Lebanon fighting. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Facts
Classification
Service Status Weapon ClassArmored fighting vehicle 1 Introduced YearSourced to the subject's own account Weapon Class
Weapon Class (category) Connections
Operated By
Source Wikipedia: Charioteer (tank)
Used In
Source Wikipedia: Charioteer (tank)
Sources
1. Wikipedia: Charioteer (tank)
Infobox: service
1952-1980
Lead and body text
This was to incorporate the same 20 pounder (84 mm) gun as used in the Centurion Mk 3.
Lead section
The Charioteer Tank, or FV4101 Tank, Medium Gun, Charioteer was a post-World War II British armoured fighting vehicle.
Operated By: British Army, Infobox: used_by
British Army Finnish Army Royal Jordanian Army Lebanese Army
Used In: Six-Day War, Wikipedia article text
The tanks were used by a number of forces in the Middle East through instability in the region, such as the Six-Day War and the Lebanese Civil War.
View the Source2. Charioteer (tank) (Wikidata)
WikidataWikidata Q578325 (P729 service entry): 1952Quote, Wikidata Q578325 (P729 service entry): 1952
Service entry (Wikidata property P729): 1952.
View the Source Wikidata: Charioteer (tank)
Wikidata Q578325, class allow-list match (w-wdresolver-0926)View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.