The M72 LAW is a man-portable 66mm disposable unguided anti-tank weapon adopted by the United States Army and Marine Corps in early 1963 as their primary individual infantry anti-tank weapon, replacing the M31 HEAT rifle grenade and the M20A1 Super Bazooka. It has remained in service from 1963 to the present and was later also adopted by the U.S. Air Force for airbase defense.
Facts
Classification
CaliberSourced to the subject's own account Service Status Weapon ClassDisposable unguided anti-tank weapon 2 Introduced Year Weapon Class
Weapon Class (category) Connections
Used In
Source M72 LAW, Wikipedia
Source M72 LAW, Wikipedia
Source M72 LAW, Wikipedia
Source M72 LAW, Wikipedia
Source M72 LAW, Wikipedia
Source M72 LAW, Wikipedia
Source M72 LAW, Wikipedia
Source M72 LAW, Wikipedia
In the Other Atlases
- Also in Business Atlas: Nammo, manufactured by there.
Sources
1. M72 LAW (Wikidata)
WikidataWikidata Q177372 (P729 service entry): 1963
Service entry (Wikidata property P729): 1963.
Wikidata Q177372 (P4403 caliber): 66mm
Caliber (Wikidata property P4403): 66.0 mm.
View the Source 2. M72 LAW, Wikipedia
Lead paragraph
is a man-portable 66 mm (2.6 in) disposable unguided anti-tank weapon.
service-status
service = 1963-present
- Used In: Vietnam War, infobox wars field: 'Vietnam War'
- Used In: Cambodian Civil War, infobox wars field: 'Cambodian Civil War'
- Used In: Laotian Civil War, infobox wars field: 'Laotian Civil War'
- Used In: Falklands War, infobox wars field: 'Falklands War'
- Used In: Gulf War, infobox wars field: 'Gulf War'
- Used In: Bosnian War, infobox wars field: 'Bosnian War'
- Used In: Iraq War, infobox wars field: 'Iraq War'
- Used In: Syrian Civil War, infobox wars field: 'Syrian Civil War'
- Used In: Yemeni Civil War, infobox wars field: 'Yemeni Civil War'
- Used In: Russo-Ukrainian War, infobox wars field: 'Russo-Ukrainian War'
View the Source3. Wikidata: M72 LAW
Wikidata Q177372, class allow-list match (w-wdresolver-0926)View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.