War and Military Atlas

How Battles Were Fought
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Weapons System

Lee-Metford

Small Arms And Sidearms

The Lee-Metford was a bolt action rifle developed for the British Army by combining James Paris Lee's rear locking bolt action with William Ellis Metford's seven groove rifled barrel, and manufactured by the Royal Small Arms Factory at Enfield. It was the first British bolt action service rifle, adopted in 1888 to replace the Martini-Henry as the standard arm of the British Empire, with production running from 1884 to 1896 before it was superseded in turn by the Lee-Enfield. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

Facts
Classification
Caliber
.303 British 1
Service Status
In Service 2
Service Status
Retired 1
Weapon Class
Bolt-action rifle 3
Introduced Year
1888 1
Weapon Class
Weapon Class (category)
Rifle 3
Connections

Used In

Boxer Rebellion, Wars
Source Lee-Metford (Wikipedia)
Source Lee-Metford (Wikipedia)
Source Lee-Metford (Wikipedia)
Second Boer War, Wars
Source Lee-Metford (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Sources
1. Wikidata: Lee-Metford
Wikidata Q901092, class allow-list match (w-wdresolver-0926)View the Source
2. Wikipedia: Lee-Metford
service-status
Quote, service-status
service = 1888-present (ceremonial)
View the Source
3. Wikipedia: Lee-Metford
  • Lead paragraph
    The Lee-Metford is a British bolt action rifle
  • Lead paragraph, adoption
    replaced the Martini-Henry as the standard service rifle of the British Empire in 1888
View the Source
Lee-Metford (Wikipedia)
  • Used In: First Sino-Japanese War, infobox wars field: 'First Sino-Japanese War'
  • Used In: First Italo-Ethiopian War, infobox wars field: 'First Italo-Ethiopian War'
  • Used In: Second Boer War, infobox wars field: 'Second Boer War'
  • Used In: Boxer Rebellion, infobox wars field: 'Boxer Rebellion'
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.