The Enfield Pattern 1853 rifle-musket, also known as the Pattern 1853 Enfield or P53 Enfield, was a .577 caliber Minie-type muzzle-loading rifled musket used by the British Empire from 1853 to 1867, after which many were replaced in service by the cartridge-loaded Snider-Enfield rifle. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Facts
Classification
Service Status Weapon Class Introduced Year Weapon Class
Weapon Class (category) Connections
Operated By
Source Wikipedia: Pattern 1853 Enfield
Used In
Source Wikipedia: Pattern 1853 Enfield
Source Wikipedia: Pattern 1853 Enfield
Source Wikipedia: Pattern 1853 Enfield
Source Wikipedia: Pattern 1853 Enfield
Source Wikipedia: Pattern 1853 Enfield
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source Wikidata: Pattern 1853 Enfield
Sources
1. Wikipedia: Pattern 1853 Enfield
Lead section
The Enfield Pattern 1853 rifle-musket (also known as the Pattern 1853 Enfield, P53 Enfield, and Enfield rifle-musket) was a .577 calibre Minié-type muzzle-loading rifled musket, used by the British Empire from 1853 to 1867; after which many were replaced in service by the cartridge-loaded Snider-Enfield rifle.
Introductory paragraph, service dates
used by the British Empire from 1853 to 1867
- Infobox: caliber 0.577 in
Infobox: service
1853-1867
- Operated By: Confederate States Army, infobox used_by/operator field: 'Confederate States of America'
- Used In: Crimean War, infobox wars field: 'Crimean War'
- Used In: Second Opium War, infobox wars field: 'Second Opium War'
- Used In: American Civil War, infobox wars field: 'American Civil War'
- Used In: Taiping Rebellion, infobox wars field: 'Taiping Rebellion'
- Used In: Paraguayan War, infobox wars field: 'Paraguayan War'
View the Source2. Wikidata: Pattern 1853 Enfield
Wikidata Q680898, class allow-list match (w-wdresolver-0926)View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.